It's September, the time when a whole lot of people pay a lot of attention to what's happening on the gridiron. I've done that myself for many years, but I've decided this year it's time to finally put my time and money where my principles are.
I've got two major problems with the game of American football: the injuries it causes on the field, and the way the organizations treats their players off the field.
Head trauma caused by playing football is not news...it's been reported widely for years. (A quick search will turn up plenty of articles, but here's one for easy reference.) There was even a movie. It's a difficult condition to diagnose. Different people have widely varying reactions to blows to the head. What one person shrugs off might cause serious issues for another. Worse, the effects are often delayed, showing up days, weeks, or even years later. But what is known is this...repeated hits to the head are bad for anyone, and in at least some cases are known to cause serious problems.
At the professional level, the injury potential can be excused to some extent because the players are adults able to make their own decisions. Years ago, the players weren't informed and couldn't make that decision, but these days there's no excuse for any adult playing football to plead ignorance. Adults that want to take a risk for love of the game or for a big paycheck should be allowed to make that choice.
However, the vast majority of football players aren't professionals. They're high school kids and college students, mostly still minors. We restrict young people from doing potentially dangerous things all the time, and playing a game with a high likelihood of causing life-long health issues should be no exception. But we don't discourage it - we actually do the opposite in most communities, treating football games as social events and the players as heroes. I don't want to be part of the problem by participating in the sub-professional football ecosystem, even in a small way as a spectator.
My second concern comes in at the college and professional level. The organizations that run the game (NCAA and NFL) don't treat their players very well, even if you leave aside the injury concerns.
In the NCAA, huge sums of money go to schools and coaches while the players aren't paid. At the top schools, it's possible you could argue that scholarships and benefits make up for that (although I don't think that's nearly enough), but certainly at lower division schools that's not the case. Don't believe me? Ask Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. He played basketball rather than football, but the same arguments apply to both. Basketball and football account for the vast majority of the money in college sports. The "amateurism" doctrine in college sports needs to change, and until it does I don't want to spend any more of my time or money in support.
In the NFL, the majority of players don't have guaranteed contracts. If they get injured or just slow down a bit, they can be cut and the team owes them nothing. The average NFL career is less than 4 years, and most players won't make big money in that time. Enough to live on, certainly, but if they get a costly injury...very likely...that money won't last.
There's also been a lot of news in the last few years about NFL players protesting against treatment of people of color at the hands of the police. Some people have said they stopped watching football because those players were disrespectful of the United States. I don't agree with that at all, and fully support the right of the protesters. In fact, one of my reasons for not watching football is the opposite...I think the NFL owners have suppressed those protests. The obvious example is the way that Colin Kaepernick has been unable to find a team, but the NFL has tried to make rules limiting the ability to protest and individual owners have spoken out against it.
For all these reasons, I've decided it's time to make a clean break with football. It's impossible to completely avoid it...it's everywhere on the news and across the Internet...but I won't be spending time watching TV coverage, or spending any money on merchandise or attending games. One person won't make a difference, I know, but it feels like the right thing to do. If enough people eventually make the same decision, change may come.
Showing posts with label college football. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college football. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 5, 2018
Sunday, September 4, 2016
American Football Season
It's the first big weekend of the (American) football season, with most colleges playing their first game. The NFL gets underway next week.
I like football, though baseball will always be my favorite of the major sports. It's certainly entertaining to watch, with plenty of action in each play. The sport is an interesting mix between strategy and individual skill. The plays called on each side are like a chess match between the coaching staff on each side, with the intent of getting the best players on each team in a position to use their skills to fullest.
Another interesting aspect of football is how much every game matters. College teams only play a dozen or so games in the regular season, and the pros just a few more. Just one bad day can make a huge difference to an entire season. There's always some kind of drama at the end of the season about which teams are going on the post-season. It happens in other sports as well, but in football, the final games have high drama just about every year.
Watching football is a bit of a guilty pleasure due to the inherent danger in the sport. The big story in recent years has been about brain injury, brought about by very large men hitting one another repeatedly in the head. There's also problems with addiction to painkillers and other drugs, on top of the purely physical issues inherent in any sport (especially such a violent one). In college and the NFL these days, I feel that the players have been sufficiently informed about the risks to make their own adult decisions. (Though that may not have been the case in the past.) But even today, I oppose the idea of high school and youth contact football. It's more dangerous for still-developing bodies, and I'd rather see the decision about such a risky activity left to those who have reached the age of majority.
This year, I've also joined a fantasy football league at the urging of some friends. I've never been a big fan of the fantasy sports games. I've tried it a few times, and generally get tired of it part-way through the season. Playing with friends makes it a bit more interesting, though. So I'll probably manage to maintain interest through the end of the year, if for no other reason than to try for some bragging rights.
Some kind of unexpected happenings crop up in the football season every year. This year won't be any different, and I'm looking forward to seeing how it unfolds.
I like football, though baseball will always be my favorite of the major sports. It's certainly entertaining to watch, with plenty of action in each play. The sport is an interesting mix between strategy and individual skill. The plays called on each side are like a chess match between the coaching staff on each side, with the intent of getting the best players on each team in a position to use their skills to fullest.
Another interesting aspect of football is how much every game matters. College teams only play a dozen or so games in the regular season, and the pros just a few more. Just one bad day can make a huge difference to an entire season. There's always some kind of drama at the end of the season about which teams are going on the post-season. It happens in other sports as well, but in football, the final games have high drama just about every year.
Watching football is a bit of a guilty pleasure due to the inherent danger in the sport. The big story in recent years has been about brain injury, brought about by very large men hitting one another repeatedly in the head. There's also problems with addiction to painkillers and other drugs, on top of the purely physical issues inherent in any sport (especially such a violent one). In college and the NFL these days, I feel that the players have been sufficiently informed about the risks to make their own adult decisions. (Though that may not have been the case in the past.) But even today, I oppose the idea of high school and youth contact football. It's more dangerous for still-developing bodies, and I'd rather see the decision about such a risky activity left to those who have reached the age of majority.
This year, I've also joined a fantasy football league at the urging of some friends. I've never been a big fan of the fantasy sports games. I've tried it a few times, and generally get tired of it part-way through the season. Playing with friends makes it a bit more interesting, though. So I'll probably manage to maintain interest through the end of the year, if for no other reason than to try for some bragging rights.
Some kind of unexpected happenings crop up in the football season every year. This year won't be any different, and I'm looking forward to seeing how it unfolds.
Labels:
college football,
NFL,
sports
Monday, December 28, 2015
Navy Football's Uniform Ships
I watched some of the Military Bowl today, Pitt visiting Navy. It's a bit of a rarity for a team to play in their home stadium for a bowl game, but it happens occasionally. Navy had a good year and certainly deserved their invite to this one.
I like watching the military service academies play when I get the chance. They're almost always at a disadvantage in terms of personnel, since their players are at the academy for training first and athletics second. They're always competitive, though, and fun to watch.
Every once in a while the service academies do have a highly talented player, like the Navy quarterback Keenan Reynolds. He'd already set the career FBS record for rushing touchdowns during the regular season. During the Military Bowl, he picked up the records for career total rushing yards by a quarterback and overall touchdowns-from-scrimmage. And he's just as impressive off the field, studying things like cyber warfare at the Naval Academy.
However, the thing that I found most interesting about this game (and also the Army-Navy game a few weeks ago) was the Navy uniforms, specifically the helmets. Each position on the team had a different ship painted on their helmets, equating the ship's role to the player.
From the news item on the Navy website:
Helmet Details and Position Assignment:
• Linebacker: Cruiser- Provides anti-air defense and packs the biggest punch of Naval surface ships representative of the linebackers on the Navy football team.
• Defensive Back: Destroyer- Known for significant fire power, speed, and anti-missile defense as are Navy's defensive backs.
• Wide Receiver: Submarine- Predominantly utilized as blockers, wide receivers play a key role in driving the Navy rush attack, taking on a stealth-like persona as they blend into the rhythm of the offense but bring significant fire power when called upon, just like a Naval submarine.
• Lineman: Amphibious Assault Ships- Just as a lineman's job is the create a hole for a running back or linebacker, these ships are utilized to establish the "beach head" that enables the invading force to gain access and ultimately accomplish their objective.
• Quarterback: Aircraft Carrier- The QB of the Naval Fleet, the aircraft carrier is the ultimate decision maker; the "quick strike" weapon of the Naval fleet.
• Running Back: Littoral Combat Ship- Like running backs, these fast and nimble ships can navigate through both crowded shallow and deep waters.
• Kicker/Special Teams: Minesweeper- Much like the specific task of the Navy special teams, this small ship has a unique mission of identifying and eliminating mines.
OK, so it's a bit of a stretch in a few cases, but still a neat idea. And they look great, too. I think all the service academies should be allowed to do similar things if they want...and no one else.
I like watching the military service academies play when I get the chance. They're almost always at a disadvantage in terms of personnel, since their players are at the academy for training first and athletics second. They're always competitive, though, and fun to watch.
Every once in a while the service academies do have a highly talented player, like the Navy quarterback Keenan Reynolds. He'd already set the career FBS record for rushing touchdowns during the regular season. During the Military Bowl, he picked up the records for career total rushing yards by a quarterback and overall touchdowns-from-scrimmage. And he's just as impressive off the field, studying things like cyber warfare at the Naval Academy.
However, the thing that I found most interesting about this game (and also the Army-Navy game a few weeks ago) was the Navy uniforms, specifically the helmets. Each position on the team had a different ship painted on their helmets, equating the ship's role to the player.
From the news item on the Navy website:
Helmet Details and Position Assignment:
• Linebacker: Cruiser- Provides anti-air defense and packs the biggest punch of Naval surface ships representative of the linebackers on the Navy football team.
• Defensive Back: Destroyer- Known for significant fire power, speed, and anti-missile defense as are Navy's defensive backs.
• Wide Receiver: Submarine- Predominantly utilized as blockers, wide receivers play a key role in driving the Navy rush attack, taking on a stealth-like persona as they blend into the rhythm of the offense but bring significant fire power when called upon, just like a Naval submarine.
• Lineman: Amphibious Assault Ships- Just as a lineman's job is the create a hole for a running back or linebacker, these ships are utilized to establish the "beach head" that enables the invading force to gain access and ultimately accomplish their objective.
• Quarterback: Aircraft Carrier- The QB of the Naval Fleet, the aircraft carrier is the ultimate decision maker; the "quick strike" weapon of the Naval fleet.
• Running Back: Littoral Combat Ship- Like running backs, these fast and nimble ships can navigate through both crowded shallow and deep waters.
• Kicker/Special Teams: Minesweeper- Much like the specific task of the Navy special teams, this small ship has a unique mission of identifying and eliminating mines.
OK, so it's a bit of a stretch in a few cases, but still a neat idea. And they look great, too. I think all the service academies should be allowed to do similar things if they want...and no one else.
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Bowled Over
There are 41 college football bowls this season, up 2 from the previous year, and up about 30 from the number that the vast majority of people pay any attention to. You can't turn on ESPN without seeing a bowl game or ads for the upcoming bowl games. Having so many bowl games is moderately silly, but I can't see that it's doing much harm.
College football bowls are a strange beast. There really isn't another post-season like it in any sport that I'm familiar with. Most post-season structures are built entirely around determining a single champion. We do have three games in the current bowl structure that hold a 4-team playoff, but the vast majority of bowls are unrelated to the championship. In most sports, teams with no chance at the overall championship are sent home. But in college football, a lot of those teams still play a bowl game.
There's been a goodly amount of angst around the Internet about how many bowls are being played, and I've heard plenty in person, too. The biggest complaint is that with so many games to play, you can no longer fill them all with teams that had a winning regular-season record. (There were three 5-7 teams in bowls this year.) That's unfortunate, but I can't see how it makes a lot of difference. As close as many college football games are, the difference between 5-7 and 6-6 can easily be just a single play (or call by an official) in a single game. Having that play go the wrong way doesn't make a 5-7 team any less worthy than a 6-6 team, or even a 7-5 team that got two plays to go the right way.
Another argument against the bowl proliferation is that the importance of making it to a bowl game is diminished. While that is true, I don't think it's a significant argument. Players, coaches, and fans already know that making it to the Random-Corporate-Sponsor.com Bowl isn't the same as one of the long-running traditional bowls, or the championship playoff. No one is going to think less of the Rose Bowl because the Foster Farms Bowl exists.
Some folks have tried to make the argument that having more bowls cuts into the school time of the players, or adds to their potential for injury. Both true, but compared to the school impact or injury possibilities of a full regular season of football, one additional bowl game isn't a significant addition.
And of course there's the money-making aspect of bowl season, with huge amounts of money flowing from sponsors to bowl organizers and conferences and teams. I don't think much of how the NCAA handles money in any of their sports, but I also don't think fewer games will help the issues that exist.
The best argument I've seen for having all these bowl games is the opportunity it gives to the players. These are young men playing a team sport that takes up a significant portion of their lives during their college years. Most of them won't ever play in the NFL or another professional league. The bowl game could very well be the highlight of their career, even if it's just some no-name bowl with a few thousand fans in the stands.
College football has a lot of issues to address, from injury concerns to where the money goes. But having too many bowl games isn't one of them.
![]() |
| Not one of the new bowls! |
There's been a goodly amount of angst around the Internet about how many bowls are being played, and I've heard plenty in person, too. The biggest complaint is that with so many games to play, you can no longer fill them all with teams that had a winning regular-season record. (There were three 5-7 teams in bowls this year.) That's unfortunate, but I can't see how it makes a lot of difference. As close as many college football games are, the difference between 5-7 and 6-6 can easily be just a single play (or call by an official) in a single game. Having that play go the wrong way doesn't make a 5-7 team any less worthy than a 6-6 team, or even a 7-5 team that got two plays to go the right way.
Another argument against the bowl proliferation is that the importance of making it to a bowl game is diminished. While that is true, I don't think it's a significant argument. Players, coaches, and fans already know that making it to the Random-Corporate-Sponsor.com Bowl isn't the same as one of the long-running traditional bowls, or the championship playoff. No one is going to think less of the Rose Bowl because the Foster Farms Bowl exists.
Some folks have tried to make the argument that having more bowls cuts into the school time of the players, or adds to their potential for injury. Both true, but compared to the school impact or injury possibilities of a full regular season of football, one additional bowl game isn't a significant addition.
And of course there's the money-making aspect of bowl season, with huge amounts of money flowing from sponsors to bowl organizers and conferences and teams. I don't think much of how the NCAA handles money in any of their sports, but I also don't think fewer games will help the issues that exist.
The best argument I've seen for having all these bowl games is the opportunity it gives to the players. These are young men playing a team sport that takes up a significant portion of their lives during their college years. Most of them won't ever play in the NFL or another professional league. The bowl game could very well be the highlight of their career, even if it's just some no-name bowl with a few thousand fans in the stands.
College football has a lot of issues to address, from injury concerns to where the money goes. But having too many bowl games isn't one of them.
Wednesday, November 11, 2015
What is that CFB Playoff Committee thinking?
The college football playoff rankings were updated last night, and everyone and their dog has some kind of opinion on why they're wrong. (Especially if that dog is from Iowa.) I'm going to buck the trend and explain why they're right.
First, let's be clear about what these rankings are. What the committee is doing is predicting which teams they think will be in the playoff. That's not the same as ranking which team looks best right now, or looking at which team has the fewest losses thus far. Yes, they take performance in the season thus far into account, and margin of victory/strength of schedule/etc do play a role. But what really determines rank is where the committee members believe the team will be when the playoffs start.
So let's look at this week's rankings in that light:
First, let's be clear about what these rankings are. What the committee is doing is predicting which teams they think will be in the playoff. That's not the same as ranking which team looks best right now, or looking at which team has the fewest losses thus far. Yes, they take performance in the season thus far into account, and margin of victory/strength of schedule/etc do play a role. But what really determines rank is where the committee members believe the team will be when the playoffs start.
So let's look at this week's rankings in that light:
- Number 1: Clemson (9-0). No stretch here. To remain undefeated, they only have to win their last three regular-season games against Syracuse, Wake Forest, and South Carolina (combined record 5-15) and then the ACC Championship game. That will likely be against North Carolina, and is likely the toughest test remaining for the Tigers.
- Number 2: Alabama (8-1). The fact that the Crimson Tide have lost a game makes this probably the most controversial ranking. It was a very un-Saban-like game with multiple mistakes and turnovers, and some extreme good fortune for Ole Miss on the other side (helmet bounce TD, anyone?) but it's still a loss. But remember, we're predicting here, not looking back. The reason you put Alabama at #2 is that (A) you believe they will win every game from here on, which includes Mississippi State next up, and the Iron Bowl, and the SEC Championship Game; and (B) you believe everyone else not in the top 4 will either also have 1+ losses or be Houston.
- Number 3: Ohio State (9-0). Despite looking fairly weak in a couple of their wins, the Buckeyes haven't lost yet. They have three significant games left: Michigan State, Michigan, and the conference championship game against (very likely) Iowa. This ranking means the committee believes they'll win all of those.
- Number 4: Notre Dame (8-1). Another team with a loss! Shouldn't Baylor or Oklahoma State or Iowa be here instead? Well, let's look ahead. Since Ohio State is #3, that means Iowa is effectively a one-loss team in the committee's minds. Since Baylor and OK State play one another, one of them is a one-loss team also. Both also have to play Oklahoma, and Baylor still has TCU as well. It's not a stretch to think that both Baylor and OK State will end up having lost a game after that Big 12 gauntlet has been run. If that's what you believe, then putting Notre Dame at #4 above those three teams makes perfect sense. Of course, the Irish will have to win out, including a big showdown with Stanford, or it's likely you'll see the Cardinal in this spot instead.
What about Houston, who are also 9-0? They still have to beat Memphis, Navy, and (likely) Temple to stay undefeated. That alone would keep them out of the higher end of the rankings, because none of those are creampuff games. Even if they do win out, a weak strength of schedule is likely to keep them out of the top 4. So from a prediction standpoint, there's no reason to put Houston anywhere near the top, and indeed they're way down at #24.
So, if you believe that...
- Clemson won't clemson away any of their remaining games.
- The fear of Saban has been put into the Tide such that they won't screw up another game like they did against Ole Miss.
- The Buckeyes will sweep the Mitten State and beat Iowa in the Big 10 championship.
- Notre Dame will win out, including that big last regular-season game against Stanford.
- The Big 12 teams will beat on each other such that none of them remain undefeated.
...then this is exactly what the rankings should be. Don't like something in there? All your team has to do is prove one of those things wrong.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



