From the New World (anime)

From the New World is a combination of post-apocalyptic dystopia and mind-bending mystery. It's set in the far future, after humans developed psychic abilities leading to conflicts that nearly ended the world. In this world, society is strictly controlled to keep a tight rein on those abilities.

The main character, Saki, and her friends grow up in this society and learn their powers like the other children. Unlike the others, though, Saki's group pushes the boundaries set by their elders. They manage to learn something of world history and the sometimes draconian methods used by their leaders in keeping society under control. But even those methods can't prevent every disaster.

A good chunk of the story revolves around an intelligent animal race called Monster Rats. They have no psychic powers, and treat the humans as gods. And the humans behave as such, putting restrictions and rules in place for the Monster Rat society. A small number of powerful individuals holding sway over a large population...nothing could possibly go wrong with that, right?

I really enjoyed the world-building of From the New World, and most of the mystery aspect of the story. There's several points where I thought the plot dragged a bit, and some of the interpersonal relationship stuff seemed awfully contrived to me. But those are fairly minor nitpicks, and overall the show kept me entertained and interested throughout.

Provenance by Ann Leckie

Provenance by Ann Leckie
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Provenance tells the story of an insecure young woman finding her place in her world. Not an unusual theme, but then add that the world is part of a human diaspora of in space and the other characters aren't all human, and it gets a bit more interesting.

The protagonist in Provenance is Ingray, who hails from the world of Hwae and is competing with her brother to be their mother's heir. She makes some questionable decisions in pursuit of that goal, meets some very interesting other humans and non-humans, witnesses a murder, and gets herself unwittingly involved in some very high-stakes conflicts between governments. In resolving all of that excitement, she grows up enough to know more about what she really wants from life.

The entire novel is written from Ingray's viewpoint and we hear much of her inner dialogue, much of it revealing a distinct lack of self-confidence. This isn't new, I've read books with similar characters before - but it's pretty rare in my experience for the character to grow and yet continue to express that weakness. Ingray never does become a heroine with nerves of steel, but she does learn to use the skills and abilities she has, even if she's frightened and unsure of herself the entire time. And a little good fortune and some good friends certainly help.

There's plenty about the wider world - aliens, political intrigue, other cultures - that Ingray doesn't know, and so the reader tends to learn about those things along with her. That's convenient for explanation, but it does make some of the plot points feel like deus ex machina when she suddenly becomes aware of something new and it causes significant changes. I didn't like that at first, but then I realized that's pretty much how Ingray herself would have felt, and then it made more sense.

Provenance is set in the same universe as the Imperial Radch trilogy, which I read a few years ago. This book doesn't really touch on the events in the trilogy, though there are a few references to what happened. Even a few bits that could be considered minor spoilers, so be warned if you haven't read the trilogy. And we learn more about the universe, most notably the alien Geck.

One part of Provenance that I found particularly interesting was the Hwae culture's reverence for "vestiges" - basically souvenirs from important dates in a person's life or the history of the larger culture. Some pretty significant parts of the book rely on the way the Hwae assign importance to these objects...whether they're the real thing or not. As long as everyone believes they're seeing an important bit of history, it might as well be the real thing.

I enjoyed Provenance, and anyone who's read Leckie's other work certainly will as well. If you haven't yet given her work a try, do so...though I'd start with the Imperial Radch trilogy.

Kill Decision by Daniel Suarez

Kill Decision by Daniel Suarez
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Kill Decision is a near-future techno-thriller based on the disturbing concept of financial interests using technology to further their profit goals without morals or accountability. That's not a new idea, of course, there's been plenty of other books (and movies/TV/etc) based on the same idea of some shadowy conspiracy manipulating events with no regard for consequences to the world. I think Suarez does a fine job of implementing the concept using modern society and technology, so it didn't bother me that there wasn't much in the way of new ground covered.

The novel revolves around advances in autonomous drone technology, most notably vision processing and swarming behavior. I'm no expert in those fields, but I consider myself an informed layman, and it certainly doesn't feel like Suarez is reaching all that far past what's possible right now. What the novel proposes in these fields is advanced refinements of capabilities that we're already seeing in labs today - years away, not decades, if someone really wanted to do it and dedicated the resources.

It's not all techno-games, of course; there's plenty of interesting characters with personality in Kill Decision. The main character is Linda McKinney, a scientist who studies ants. Her work is co-opted by the bad guys, and she's saved from elimination by a team of black-ops soldiers. They proceed to spend the rest of the novel roaming around the world to stop the conspiratorial disaster. My favorite character was the heavy-metal-loving commando Foxy, right-hand man to team leader and hero Odin. All of it is well-written and engaging, if not particularly unique.

Kill Decision is a enjoyable read, fast-paced and interesting. The reader can just enjoy the action, or think a little deeper about some of the moral questions. (What kind of danger are we in from certain kinds of technological advances? Do we have any real control over bad actors using such technology?) Either way, I recommend it.

Less by Andrew Sean Greer

Less by Andrew Sean Greer
My rating: 2 of 5 stars

Less won lots of prizes and is clearly a work that many people appreciate. It's a good case in point of the fact that I am not one of those people, because I thought it was largely boring, and the main character uninteresting.

Less follows middle-aged author Arthur Less as he jets around the world avoiding reminders of twin impending disasters: his ex-partner's marriage and turning 50. He spends a lot of time feeling out of place, unsure of himself, nostalgic for a simpler past, and unable to write. Eventually he sorts out his feelings (somewhat) and manages to write again (but not finish his novel) and finds resolution for his romantic woes (but not on purpose). This is not a book with an exciting, gripping plot.

Arthur is gay. There were maybe one or two places where this actually mattered, as far as I can tell, most notably one bit where one of his books is rejected because it deals only with a white gay man instead of something more exotic. Other than that, you could swap the gender of a few characters and maybe a few locations to make this a straight novel and it would read very much the same. Arthur has no struggles over being gay, there's no discrimination, practically everyone he meets is either also gay or could care less. Which is fine, something of an ideal world in fact, but it begs the question of why write a novel about it? Ideal isn't interesting.

Romantic relationships seem to define Arthur's self-image. He's with an older partner in a long-term but still somewhat casual relationship; that ends and he finds a younger partner to do basically the same thing in mirror image; then that ends and he's alone and pathetic. Completely alien to my mindset, putting this kind of weight on romance and yet not actually pursuing a solid lasting relationship. To me, it makes Arthur simply look like someone unable to decide what he really wants out of life...not uncommon, but not interesting enough to base a novel on. This being a romantic novel, there is an eventual resolution to Arthur's love woes...but it fell flat with me, as it basically falls into his lap, through no fault of his own.

The writing style of Greer reminds me of when I was reading classics in school. Some genuinely funny or moving prose, surrounded by a whole lot of flowery language meant to convey characters' mindsets that goes off in all directions and is either uninteresting or confusing. So I can see why the literary critics loved it, but it is definitely not to my taste.

There are obviously lots of people who enjoyed Less, most notably a Pulitzer committee. However, I am not one of them.

On the Wing: American Poems of Air and Space Flight

On the Wing: American Poems of Air and Space Flight by Karen Yelena Olsen
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I'm not much of a poetry person. On the rare occasions that I read any, about 90% of it does nothing for me. Too abstract, too vague, too flowery. But every once in a while, there's a bit that does make an impression.

On The Wing is a poetry collection all about flight, and it wasn't an exception to that 90% rule of thumb. Much of the parts that didn't click for me were about the feeling of flying, largely by pilots or those writing about pilots. It's not that I don't enjoy a bit of romanticism about flight...there are some songs I like that fit that description...but the format here didn't work for me.

The 10% that I did find interesting, though, was pretty good. Much of it was about passenger flight, which makes sense considering that I've spent a lot of time as a passenger. Rosanna Warren's "from North", for instance, the first section of which is about the feeling of being a passenger while flying through dangerous weather. And Simon Ortiz's "A San Diego Poem" that describes a whole trip, including feeling a bit lost in an airport after disembarking. I also enjoyed several in the section related to military flight, most notably "Tuskegee Airfield" by Marilyn Nelson Waniek.

This collection was published in 2004, but most of it came from prior to 2001. That means there's very little written after the attacks of September 11, 2001. Only one poem makes a direct reference, "History of the Airplane" by Lawrence Ferlinghetti (written in 2002). Oh, there's still a few pieces that deal with hijackings, but they don't have the kind of urgency and trauma that you'd expect from people who lived through that day. I suspect that similar works written in the last two decades are quite a bit more focused on security and danger.

Poetry is never going to be my favored form of writing. Given the right subject matter, though, I can find some pieces that I enjoy like I did with On The Wing.

The Boys (comics)

The Boys is a comic series based in a world where super-powers are real, but almost no one who has them is a hero. They put on a good public face, but behind the scenes nearly every one is terrible. And a small group of operatives, who are pretty terrible themselves, track down the secrets and hand out punishments.

All that sounds like it's a fun concept, and it would be, if the writers of The Boys weren't so fond of going over the top with every kind of the worst excess and immorality. Most of it is sexual, though there's plenty of violence as well. Some of it actually matters to the plot and world-building, and that part I don't mind. But I'd say that's maybe a third of what's actually presented, with the rest being just unnecessary crude sensationalism and humor.

It's possible to do this kind of "if super-powers were real people would be terrible with them" thing in a different way. I know because it already was done, back in 2003 with Supreme Power. That series had its share of sex and violence, but it wasn't thrown in your face on every page, and most of it had a purpose in the story.

I read the first collection volume of The Boys for a few reasons. I have friends who have liked it, I was looking for a new graphic novel to read anyway, and also I'd heard there was going to be a TV series made. But if the TV series holds true to the style of the comics, I doubt I'll want to watch it.

The world-building, the characters, the story plots...all that stuff is interesting and fairly well executed in The Boys. If the writers could have just restrained their impulse to cram crude language and humor into every possible nook and cranny of their creation, I'd have really liked it. But as it is, I can't say the good parts are worth the sludge you have to read through on the way.

Good Omens (Amazon 2019)

The Good Omens miniseries from Amazon navigates the tricky waters of book-to-video adaptation in a largely successful fashion.

I first read Good Omens 20+ years ago, and several times since. Considering the authors, it's unsurprising that I liked it so much. Both Pratchett and Gaiman have written plenty of good stuff, most of which I've read. Their collaboration is as good as one might expect, and from all accounts they enjoyed writing it as much as we've enjoyed reading it.

I have no complaints with the production quality or the casting of the video series. The visuals are beautiful, and the costumes and special effects bring some of the more exotic descriptions in the book to life. Both Michael Sheen and David Tennant are excellent as the two leads, and I thought the kids playing the Them did a great job also. (OK, maybe one minor complaint, I wasn't terribly impressed with the special effects of the Bentley-on-fire-across-M25 scene. So much more potential there.)

Film adaptation has to strike a balance between getting the details right for fans of the original book, and keeping things simple enough for those unfamiliar with it to understand. Good Omens is somewhat heavy on the side of the details, in my opinion. I think it's difficult to get the very understated humor of the book to come across on screen or in narration without leaving unfamiliar viewers feeling confused or even bored. Plus it would simply take up a whole lot of screen time to fully explain everything so a viewer can reach the same level of understanding that one gets from the book. So the creators of the series decided to stay largely faithful to the book, even if it meant that those who hadn't read the book would be a bit lost at time.

That's not to say that everything is exactly like the book, of course. There are quite a few minor characters and plot points left out. Slightly disappointing to some of us who read the book, but not surprising and not a major problem. I would have loved to see the Other Four Horsemen, for instance, but I can certainly understand why that bit was left out. Not essential to the storyline and would have taken a good amount of screen time.

All told, I loved the Good Omens series as a long-time fan of the book. I'd recommend reading the book first for anyone planning to watch the series, or at least give it a second watch after you've had a chance to get through the book. You'll likely pick up on quite a few things that weren't completely clear to a non-reader viewer.